• Home

Chaos³

  • Writer, Geek, Dissident

    Between fits of righteous anger, working on fantasy novel THE BRIGHT AND THE GLOOM.

    Highly combustible.

    Approach with caution.

    Home
  • @ChaosTheThird
  • Browse the Archive
  • Subscribe via RSS
  • To PoC or not to PoC, that is the question…

    • Link
    • 34 notes
    • 1 month ago

    Yes, thank you for such a comprehensive response. I actually struggled to define “people of color” in a concise way, recognizing that it did rely upon whiteness as a mirror. And yet, while I agree with most of what you’re saying, I do find some utility in the term, just in that I feel unity amongst those who struggle under white oppression is important. Of vital importance.

    My only counter would be that in the same way that “black” does not describe any singular experience except, again, in response to white oppression, but rather incorporates immeasurable diversity along physical, cultural, and experiential lines, “PoC” does not have to imply that all people under that label have the same experience. 

    I think the term is political, but in a good way, providing power through solidarity. And solidarity cannot be just some symbolic statement, but has to mean that that we all look at each other’s struggles, I mean really see them, recognize the differences both vast and nuanced that you talk about, and do what we can to provide support.

    passportharlem:

    Q: You mentioned in the post about CFC vs. ABG that you do not identify with the term “PoC”. I was curious as to the reasoning behind that?

    I guess the best way for me to answer that question is to say I think the term people of color is really dishonest, as it simultaneously conflates and elides the myriad ways “people of color” experience white oppression. So although I understand the seemingly progressive impulse to unite folks under this umbrella term, the phrase just feels really imprecise to me, and I think the already anemic language we have around race/culture/etc. needs to be exact. 

    A black person, for example, might get racially profiled for driving a Benz, but is that person going to have to prove US citizenship when the police officer taps on the window?

    Or, if this same black person is born of black parents native to the US and attends an elite institution such as Harvard, then her experience is probably more notable and quite different than, say, that of her first-generation schoolmate whose parents come from Nigeria. I think those distinctions are imperative, but they get lost when we employ people of color as some kind of unifying term. It allows the privileges that many receive in spite—or even because—of skin color, accent, etc. to become obscured. In fact, I think to actively identify as PoC allows many to conveniently deny the privilege they have. Stereotyping is not good, but I think there’s an incredible difference between people assuming you’re a doctor and people assuming you’re a drug dealer. When we abandon specificity we prevent these distinctions from coming to the fore.

    Furthermore, since the term, I guess, technically describes all non-white people, we have to assume, on some level, that we all experience white oppression similarly. And that’s just not true. Sure, there are commonalities, but not enough, for me at least, to embrace the term. To add, I think employing PoC implicitly reifies whiteness as the default position, that thing we’re always juxtaposing. It’s very “us vs. them.” And I think it important to disrupt that inclination to center whiteness when attempting to understand what we experience because of it.

    Mostly, though, I think it’s really nice-sounding semantics that isn’t very useful. I prefer my language delineating such issues to be sharper and less soft and flowery.

    I hope that answers your question.

    1. techniques22hk liked this
    2. together12up liked this
    3. blaktivist reblogged this from passportharlem and added:
      it…” Good point Summer -[bLaK.]
    4. chaosthethird reblogged this from passportharlem and added:
      couldn’t agree more, on all counts. And…yeah, don’t even get me started on #occupy. Talk about problematic terms
    5. chaosthethird liked this
    6. fuckyeahselfcare liked this
    7. princepsfemina liked this
    8. suzy-x liked this
    9. eshusplayground liked this
    10. crunkfeministcollective reblogged this from passportharlem
    11. crunkfeministcollective liked this
    12. passportharlem reblogged this from chaosthethird and added:
      a few instances where...phrase is appropriate. What...failed...
    13. chaosthethird posted this
  • PoCpeople of coloridentitysolidarityoppressionunitywhitenessraceracism

Prev Next
Tumblr Themes created by Obox